Accès gratuit
| Numéro |
Thérapie
Volume 64, Numéro 3, Mai-Juin 2009
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Page(s) | 229 - 232 | |
| Section | Évaluation du Médicament/Drug evaluation | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.2515/therapie/2009032 | |
| Publié en ligne | 13 août 2009 | |
- Ioannidis JP. Indirect comparisons: the mesh and mess of clinical trials. Lancet; 2006: (368): 1470-2 [Google Scholar]
- Lu G, Ades AE. Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons. Star Med 2004; 20: 3105-24 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Cucherat M. Les comparaisons indirectes : méthodes et validité. 2009, Haute Autorité de Santé - Service évaluation des médicaments: Paris. p. 66 [Google Scholar]
- Bombardier C, Maetzel A. Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of new treatments: efficacy versus effectiveness studies? Ann Rheum Dis 1999; 58 Suppl 1: I82-5 [Google Scholar]
- Gartlehner G, Moore CG. Direct versus indirect comparisons: a summary of the evidence. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2008; 24(2): 170–7 [Google Scholar]
- Song F, Altman DG, Glenny AM, et al. Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 326 (7387): 472 [Letter] [Google Scholar]
- Falissard B, Izard V, Xerri B, et al. Relative Effectiveness Assessment of Listed Drugs (REAL): a new method for an early comparison of the effectiveness of approved health technologies. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2009. in press [Google Scholar]
- Boissel JP, Collet JP, Lievre M, et al. An effect model for the assessment of drug benefit: example of antiarrhythmic drugs in postmyocardial infarction patients. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1993; 22(3): 356-63 [Google Scholar]
- De Leeuw J. Unidimensional scaling, in encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science, BS Everitt and D Howell, editors. 2005, John Wiley & Sons [Google Scholar]
- Glenny AM, Altman DG, Song F, et al. International stroke trial collaborative group: indirect comparisons of competing interventions. Health Technol Assess 2005; 9(26): 1-134 [Google Scholar]